11 Comments

I deleted all of my Meta accounts after I heard what Zuckerberg said about corporations needing more masculine energy and that they need to be aggressive. It's clear that he's kissing up to the powers that be. But my bigger issue is that as a male, I don't agree with their redefinition of what masculinity is to be (aggressive, unmerciful). We've had other, better role models: Fred Rogers, Jimmy Carter, and Jesus himself who compared himself to a mother hen. But these guys (Zuck and the bros)want to go back to normalizing thuggishness. And it's all because they want to please the Thug in Chief, the thuggiest one of all.

Expand full comment

Appreciate your writing!

Expand full comment

I really like your line: “Mercy is hidden, active, burning, living love.” What a contrast from what we see played out now. Feels sickening. 😔 Thanks for writing so thoughtfully and boldly.

Expand full comment

Erika, thank you. Sending solidarity from Seattle.

Expand full comment

“This kind of solidarity work is quiet. Serving as the hands and feet of Jesus is not conceptual, it is formative.” Such a great article, Sara. Thank you for your brave and beautiful authenticity and the encouragement to keep on keeping on. ❤️

Expand full comment

Deb, thank you!

Expand full comment

"Why does mercy get no respect? Why does mercy evoke jaded annoyance? Why is mercy treated with contempt? Why does care, still, in 2025, read as a feminine virtue?"

I love these questions and hate that there's such a deep need for them. Fighting to claim the value of virtues (like care) that are deemed "feminine" and devalued accordingly.

Expand full comment

With you.

Expand full comment

Yes and amen. 👊

Expand full comment

I relate to all of this. And it was also helpful to me to consolidate my reactions in the long-form substack space. As you said, this feels like the best format for healthy expression online.

Expand full comment

Absolutely Kacie, I appreciated your post and important global perspectives.

Expand full comment